ope-l-0504
By Date

Most recent messages
255 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:44:58 EST
Ending: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 09:58:15 EDT

• Re: [OPE-L] how can you calculate efficiency? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:44:50 EST)
• Re: [OPE-L] 'Capital & Class' FREE ONLINE ! Francisco Paulo Cipolla (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:01:50 EST)
• Re: [OPE-L] 'Capital & Class' FREE ONLINE ! Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:24:54 EST)
• Re: [OPE-L] how can you calculate efficiency? michael perelman (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:27:29 EST)
• Re: [OPE-L] John H on capitalist and anti-capitalist conceptions oftime John Holloway (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:39:27 EST)
• [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 08:18:45 EST)
• [OPE-L] _Journal of Australian Political Economy_ website glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 13:31:40 EST)
• [OPE-L] Frank Thompson's Homepage glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 08:11:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Fabio Ravagnani on the Macro-Monetary interpretation of Marx's theory Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 11:05:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L] A Visit with John Holloway: How to Change the World Without Taking Power Rakesh Bhandari (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 14:02:02 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Alejandro Valle Baeza (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 14:21:55 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 14:32:46 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] how can you calculate efficiency? Paul Cockshott (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 04:26:10 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Frank Thompson's Homepage Paul Cockshott (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 05:10:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] how can you calculate efficiency? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 09:57:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L] U.S. Multinationals Reap Overseas Bounty Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 12:47:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L] estimates of the value of c as a % of GNP? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:26:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Call for book proposals: Class in ... ? glevy@PRATT.EDU (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:45:02 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] estimates of the value of c as a % of GNP? Paul Cockshott (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:26:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 09:08:35 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Rakesh Bhandari (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 10:34:57 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s B.R.Bapuji (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 10:26:19 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Rakesh Bhandari (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 10:42:28 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Riccardo Bellofiore (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 11:22:53 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Michael Heinrich (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 11:55:14 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s michael a. lebowitz (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 12:23:25 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Paul Zarembka (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 12:52:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Moody’s downgrades GM credit rating Alejandro Valle Baeza (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 14:50:45 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 08:14:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L] the rate of surplus value in Puerto Rico? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 09:41:28 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 11:52:38 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] the rate of surplus value in Puerto Rico? Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 11:56:45 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Ian Wright (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 14:12:50 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 14:53:42 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Philip Dunn (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 16:53:59 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 22:47:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Gareth Stedman Jones Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 23:09:48 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Gareth Stedman Jones michael a. lebowitz (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 23:38:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? : was RE: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 05:46:32 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? : was RE: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 06:05:20 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 08:00:24 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 09:33:42 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 09:51:27 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 10:05:41 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? glevy@PRATT.EDU (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 10:54:50 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 11:15:25 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 11:21:38 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 11:35:01 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 11:36:17 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 11:41:12 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 11:47:31 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:06:06 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:15:21 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:23:19 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:31:04 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:48:59 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:04:05 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? glevy@PRATT.EDU (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:58:05 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:10:31 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:15:11 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:31:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 17:04:12 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Ian Wright (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 17:44:42 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:16:04 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:23:12 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:42:50 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 21:49:37 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Nicola Taylor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 23:08:01 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 00:30:47 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 00:40:44 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 06:51:58 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 07:26:21 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:34:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:50:23 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 15:20:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:25:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Oeconomicus, Volume VII, 2004-2005 glevy@PRATT.EDU (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:49:10 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Ian Wright (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 19:04:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Wall Street unleashed glevy@PRATT.EDU (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:05:02 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Philip Dunn (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 04:25:41 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 05:26:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 08:53:37 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 09:03:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Marx Myths and Legends -- Official Opening Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:26:57 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Philip Dunn (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 17:01:19 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Philip Dunn (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 18:17:27 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 18:41:17 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 18:43:10 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Philip Dunn (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 05:00:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Okishio by Nakatani Alejandro Valle Baeza (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 08:14:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L] How Class Works - 2006 conference call for presentations glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 08:21:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Morishima Alejandro Valle Baeza (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 09:45:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Why I Expect Japan to Prevail: Ruminations on Morishima Alejandro Valle Baeza (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 09:55:59 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? michael a. lebowitz (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 09:53:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Commentary on _Beyond Capital_ glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 12:59:40 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Commentary on _Beyond Capital_ michael a. lebowitz (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 16:08:35 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Michael Heinrich (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 21:37:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class michael a. lebowitz (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:24:07 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:30:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Philip Dunn (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:47:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power glevy@PRATT.EDU (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 09:25:10 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 11:02:07 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:42:42 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:50:04 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Ian Wright (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:46:46 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:37:20 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:10:38 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Enrique D. Dussel's writings online Philip Dunn (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 23:56:59 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Philip Dunn (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 03:10:04 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 07:59:37 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:12:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner glevy@PRATT.EDU (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:23:00 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class michael a. lebowitz (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:37:54 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Rakesh Bhandari (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 13:36:03 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 03:20:07 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 06:02:56 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class glevy@PRATT.EDU (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 09:02:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Hegel's _Philosophy of Right_ and Marx Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:48:16 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:21:52 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's _Philosophy of Right_ and Marx Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:22:09 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? labour Christopher Arthur (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:06:06 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost Christopher Arthur (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:06:33 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Christopher Arthur (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:05:40 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:47:33 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 19:48:53 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Ian Hunt (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:17:32 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? labour Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:41:01 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:42:28 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:56:32 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 22:14:39 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Ian Hunt (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 23:51:22 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog? Philip Dunn (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 03:55:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L] labour-power as a (quasi-) commodity Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 07:57:24 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? glevy@PRATT.EDU (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:32:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Money in China and Europe Paul Cockshott (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:41:52 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:46:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:27:11 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:34:12 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Ian Hunt (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:40:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Retort, Blood for Oil? glevy@PRATT.EDU (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:21:05 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Michael Heinrich (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 21:15:54 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Michael Heinrich (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 21:42:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Corporate conquest, global geopolitics: Intellectual Property and BITs glevy@PRATT.EDU (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:40:52 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:50:55 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Paul Zarembka (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 10:14:54 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost Andrew Brown (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 11:55:36 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power John Holloway (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:46:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L] [roywestjp@yahoo.co.jp: New Book on Marx's Labor Theory of Value] Hans G. Ehrbar (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 01:54:18 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] New Book on Marx's Labor Theory of Value Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 02:11:21 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 02:19:05 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost ajit sinha (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 03:01:34 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 08:02:55 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 08:50:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your position on the Bolivarian revolution? Paul Zarembka (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 09:28:30 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 10:47:30 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 10:52:04 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] on the political economy of the working class Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 10:55:33 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Money in China and Europe Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 11:30:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Upping the Anti / On the Barricades Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 13:46:41 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Money in China and Europe Paul Cockshott (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 15:01:25 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost Ian Wright (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 15:06:25 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Ian Hunt (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 00:10:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L] 1/2 of a dialectical dance and other fragments by Bertell Ollman Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 08:22:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution Philip Dunn (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 08:29:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Why Marx's theory of value matters Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 09:03:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your position on theBolivarianrevolution? John Holloway (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 19:23:23 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your position on theBolivarianrevolution? Paul Zarembka (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:28:26 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Money in China and Europe Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 00:32:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 00:37:14 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Ian Hunt (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 01:35:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your positionontheBolivarianrevolution? John Holloway (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 06:59:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L] the scope and emphasis of working-class studies Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 09:51:25 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] the scope and emphasis of working-class studies Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 10:52:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 10:58:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Fourth World War glevy@PRATT.EDU (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 08:24:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:06:54 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost ajit sinha (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:14:54 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 11:06:02 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:11:54 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:33:39 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 17:13:53 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 18:25:47 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 00:01:33 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 00:01:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Intervention. Journal of Economics Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 08:41:11 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Howard Engelskirchen (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 08:45:10 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:19:23 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:49:18 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 10:45:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 10:58:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L] whiteness Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 12:12:31 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] whiteness Howard Engelskirchen (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 13:02:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution Ian Wright (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 13:17:35 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:05:42 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 05:30:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution Philip Dunn (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 07:57:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Freeman & Kagarlitsky, _The Politics of Empire: Globalisation in Crisis_ glevy@PRATT.EDU (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 08:09:21 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 09:05:18 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 13:06:57 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] whiteness Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 13:13:25 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 13:32:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Marxian empirical research on Brazil glevy@PRATT.EDU (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 15:34:02 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 06:03:21 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 08:48:06 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Michael Heinrich (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 09:06:50 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 10:16:56 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 10:55:38 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:25:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? glevy@PRATT.EDU (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:39:38 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:45:19 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 12:42:50 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 13:58:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 17:47:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Where does the money comer from : was Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:06:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation Silvia Federici Rakesh Bhandari (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 22:36:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Institute for the Study of Capitalism (ISC) glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 09:37:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L] the death of Andre Gunder Frank glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 16:11:39 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] the death of Andre Gunder Frank Cyrus Bina (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:26:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L] two recent pieces by Cyrus Rakesh Bhandari (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 20:37:17 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 00:20:22 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 07:58:57 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 08:56:36 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 09:52:15 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 10:39:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 13:05:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L] The Challenge of Global Slums glevy@PRATT.EDU (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:36:49 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] the death of Andre Gunder Frank glevy@PRATT.EDU (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:48:58 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Francisco Paulo Cipolla (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:49:22 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 17:39:24 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:04:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L] two unpublished papers by Peter King on Marx glevy@PRATT.EDU (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:31:02 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Where does the money comer from : was Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Ian Wright (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 20:57:24 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Where does the money comer from : was Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Paul Cockshott (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:49:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L] HELP on Sweezy Riccardo Bellofiore (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 07:01:29 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [OPE-L] HELP on Sweezy Riccardo Bellofiore (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:23:16 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [OPE-L] HELP on Sweezy Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:56:35 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Where does the money comer from glevy@PRATT.EDU (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:20:53 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Where does the money comer from Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:57:24 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s Paul Zarembka (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:38:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Critique in Sraffa and Marx glevy@PRATT.EDU (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 17:28:13 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Where does the money comer from Paul Cockshott (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 18:08:17 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? Andrew Brown (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 06:27:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L] who to thank Paul Cockshott (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:55:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Tom Nairn review Multitude by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:13:59 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] who to thank Howard Engelskirchen (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 21:56:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L] changes in the composition of the working class glevy@PRATT.EDU (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:30:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L] CFP, Neo-liberalism and the Crisis of Contemporary Society OPE-L Administrator (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:34:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Inquiry re Charles Bettelheim glevy@PRATT.EDU (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:44:03 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Inquiry re Charles Bettelheim Paul Cockshott (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 18:07:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Call For Paper akira matsumoto (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:58:40 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Inquiry re Charles Bettelheim B.R.Bapuji (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 06:33:19 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Inquiry re Charles Bettelheim Howard Engelskirchen (Sun May 01 2005 - 09:13:38 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] Inquiry re Charles Bettelheim glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 09:50:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L] Wendy Olson's Homepage(s) glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 09:56:27 EDT)
• Re: [OPE-L] John Martin's Review of _Das Kapital_ glevy@PRATT.EDU (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 09:57:33 EDT)

Last message date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 09:58:15 EDT
Archived on: Mon May 02 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT

255 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 02 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT