Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:39:38 EDT

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> see the accompanying table that gives growth of stock in million
> troy ounces.

Hi Paul C:  What is the source for the table that you attached to
your last message?  / In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT