Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?

From: Andrew Brown (A.Brown@LUBS.LEEDS.AC.UK)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 10:39:33 EDT

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers"
Previous message: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Maybe in reply to: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Btw Paul,

You are right about machine / machine power, of course. The relevant
parallel I wanted to make is between machine-power / machine
contribution, on the one hand, and labour-power / labour, on the other.

For some reason I often make that mistake.

Andy


------------

Paul

the correspondence should not be machine/machine power to 
labour/labour power. If one wants to do that the correspondance
should be (machine/machine power)  goes to (worker/labour power).

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers"
Previous message: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Maybe in reply to: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] The Contradictions of a Contrarian: Andre Gunder Frank by Jeff Sommers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT