Re: [OPE-L] various

From: Michael Perelman (michael@ECST.CSUCHICO.EDU)
Date: Wed Aug 03 2005 - 13:02:57 EDT

Next message: Francisco Paulo Cipolla: "Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela"
Previous message: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
In reply to: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
Next in thread: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
Reply: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

When I said that no economists gave an economic reason, I was thinking of theoretical
reasoning.  Just to say that it would cut into profits -- or even eliminate them -- does
not seem to be more than standard business-talk.

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 11:04:30AM +0100, Paul Bullock wrote:
> Well, Senior of course, as per Vol 1 Capital
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

Next message: Francisco Paulo Cipolla: "Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela"
Previous message: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
In reply to: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
Next in thread: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
Reply: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] various"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 05 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT