Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics

From: Ian Wright (iwright@GMAIL.COM)
Date: Thu Sep 22 2005 - 18:01:02 EDT

Next message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L] President Chavez's Speech to the United Nations"
Previous message: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
In reply to: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Next in thread: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Reply: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
> > Let's assume that the bean workers consume goods from the basic sector.
> Are
> > you then wanting to say that, therefore, "beans" are basic?
> >
>
> No, but that this makes them non-self reproducing. The beans
> thus have basics as input and are just like any other
> non-basic.


The "self-reproducing non-basics" are a subset of the non-basics (all of
which have basics as input either directly or indirectly) that happen to
also have themselves as input.

"Self-reproducing" in this context does not mean that the "beans" can be
produced without other commodities.

Enjoy the break.

-Ian.

Next message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L] President Chavez's Speech to the United Nations"
Previous message: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
In reply to: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Next in thread: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Reply: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 23 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT