Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics

From: Diego Guerrero (diego.guerrero@CPS.UCM.ES)
Date: Thu Sep 29 2005 - 07:07:56 EDT

Next message: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
In reply to: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Next in thread: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Reply: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jerry said:
>
>
> Where did Marx write this?   What does this expression imply?
> It sounds like an anti-Scottish stereotype and slur....
>
> In solidarity, Jerry


I think it is in Theories of Surplus Value, when critizicing Smith because
of his conception of the productive labour that did not include productive
labour performed outside the material (sensually tangible) production.

Next message: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
In reply to: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Next in thread: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Reply: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 30 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT