Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General

From: Philip Dunn (pscumnud@DIRCON.CO.UK)
Date: Wed Oct 19 2005 - 17:03:15 EDT

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Jurriaan on the Corruption Perceptions Index"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Next in thread: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Quoting Rakesh Bhandari <bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU>:

> On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:49:34 -0700

> Not really because I am arguing that value is not an intrinsic
> property of commodities. To say that it is intrinsic to or inherent in
> or dispositional of commodities in themselves, i.e.
> outside the system of the relative and equivalent form relation,  is
> simply commodity fetishism.

Rakesh

Surely to be a _commodity_ in itself is to be _inside_ the system of the
relative and equivalent form relation. 

Philip Dunn

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Jurriaan on the Corruption Perceptions Index"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Next in thread: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 00:00:03 EDT