Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Tue Dec 13 2005 - 19:39:53 EST

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] CFP, Future in the Present: Occupying the Social Factory"
Previous message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35"
In reply to: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35"
Next in thread: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories"
Reply: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Actually, I have the impression that important strains of Value Form
> Theory also reject the concept of verticality.  Am I wrong on this?

Hi Howard:

Which important strains of value-form theory are you referring to?

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] CFP, Future in the Present: Occupying the Social Factory"
Previous message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35"
In reply to: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35"
Next in thread: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories"
Reply: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 14 2005 - 00:00:02 EST