Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories

From: Howard Engelskirchen (howarde@TWCNY.RR.COM)
Date: Tue Dec 13 2005 - 22:52:47 EST

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Rethinking Keynesian policies and the quantitative determination of value"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] CFP, Future in the Present: Occupying the Social Factory"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Jerry,

My impression is a casual one and comes from conference conversation, so
I'll punt.  If there are folks doing such work who do take a position on the
issue, I'd be interested in hearing a discussion of it.

Thanks,

Howard


----- Original Message -----
From: <glevy@PRATT.EDU>
To: <OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories


> > Actually, I have the impression that important strains of Value Form
> > Theory also reject the concept of verticality.  Am I wrong on this?
>
> Hi Howard:
>
> Which important strains of value-form theory are you referring to?
>
> In solidarity, Jerry
>

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Rethinking Keynesian policies and the quantitative determination of value"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] CFP, Future in the Present: Occupying the Social Factory"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 15 2005 - 00:00:02 EST