Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy

From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Wed Dec 28 2005 - 13:30:41 EST

• Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] Overdetermination"
• Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Reply: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Reply: Alejandro Valle Baeza: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> In Marx's case, the unequal exchange is evaluated objectively also in
> terms of quantities of labour-time, i.e. more labour-time exchanging
> for less labour-time.

Hi Jurriaan,

Labour time can be objectively measured in working hours.   But,  how
is *socially necessary* labour time objectively measured and evaluated?

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] Overdetermination"
• Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Reply: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Reply: Alejandro Valle Baeza: "Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 29 2005 - 00:00:02 EST