From: Jurriaan Bendien (adsl675281@TISCALI.NL)
Date: Sat Apr 29 2006 - 18:26:00 EDT
Jerry, I was partly just kidding you with this stuff. Actually, when I first heard the term mentioned in 1980, I didn't hear it properly, I thought I heard "french fries of production". Lateron, inspired by scholars like Ernest Mandel and Anwar Shaikh, I delved into national accounts data, analysing the boundaries, valuation and cost structure of the social product, and I wondered how Marx would have approached it (intermediate inputs produced in-house vs. externally purchased intermediate inputs). Basically, I think that value theory is not worth much, unless it can make sense of the data of experience. Ernest Mandel wrote in the introduction to his Traite d'economie Marxiste that "the scientifically correct position is obviously that which endeavours to start from the empirical data of the science of today in order to examine whether or not the essence of Marx's economic propositions remains valid" (English edition, p. 17). This suggests a very different approach than a sterile dogmatism that endlessly repeats stock phrases, i.e. the purpose of theory becomes one of guiding the ordering, interpreting and explaining of the facts of experience. I would dispute many of Mandel's arguments, but this basic idea is I think quite sound. It is difficult perhaps for people today to appreciate what an enormous advance his book (completed in 1960!) was. Jurriaan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 02 2006 - 00:00:06 EDT