From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Wed May 03 2006 - 05:44:49 EDT
> >Well, why don't you tell the list what your "suspicions" are? > That you cannot admit that your criticism of > Neocleous' interpretation of the vampire metaphor is misplaced. > That you can't admit that you are wrong, offbase, etc. Here > are my suspicions, and we see them confirmed once again. Rakesh, You certainly know how to dance around an issue. The two of us -- and some others -- know that your "suspicions" concern something else, something more. > Was it a waste of time to bring to the list's attention to Neocleous' > paper? At least now we know what you were criticizing back in > October. You can't criticize a paper that you are unaware of. I was unaware of Neocleous's paper (or other writings) in October. But, you already knew that ... or, at least, you knew that you had not a single scrap of evidence to the contrary. We now know that you are willing to repeat a silly, unfounded and ad hominem claim without any evidence. It's really quite simple: if you think someone has done something improper or unethical, BRING US PROOF OR SHUT UP. Obviously you didn't learn your lesson from the discussion on Dunayevskaya and Shoul and their relation to Grossmann. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 31 2006 - 00:00:03 EDT