Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2006 - 11:30:50 EDT

• Next message: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Another thought about valorisation"
• In reply to: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Next in thread: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Reply: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>Thanks to those who responded.
>On Jerry's point. Notwithstanding the Verwertung problem Nicolaus is I
>think better than CW. One problem with CW 28/29 is that the two bits
>were translated by different people with inconsistencies. ALso CW 29
>209 has reified instead of objectified which is quite a bad mistake.
>But I will have to compare systematically
>Chris

Hi Chris,
will be very interested of what you make of Tribe's argument that
Marx's thinking changes after the Grundrisse with the discovery of
Quesnay's theory of re-production. Anyone's thoughts on this would
be appreciated.
Yours, Rakesh

• Next message: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Another thought about valorisation"
• In reply to: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Next in thread: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Reply: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Grundrisse. Help"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 31 2006 - 00:00:03 EDT