From: Christopher Arthur (arthurcj@WAITROSE.COM)
Date: Wed Jul 26 2006 - 11:56:44 EDT
It isn't clear to me that Marx's thinking changed - it extended. The reproduction schemes of V2 are his last major development of the theory of capital because the notes on credit never got anywhere. Notice particularly that the V2 Pt 3 stuff was written well after the V3 transformation stuff so the modern 'transformation problem' was unknown to Marx. Chris On 25 Jul 2006, at 16:30, Rakesh Bhandari wrote: >> Thanks to those who responded. >> On Jerry's point. Notwithstanding the Verwertung problem Nicolaus is I >> think better than CW. One problem with CW 28/29 is that the two bits >> were translated by different people with inconsistencies. ALso CW 29 >> 209 has reified instead of objectified which is quite a bad mistake. >> But I will have to compare systematically >> Chris > > Hi Chris, > will be very interested of what you make of Tribe's argument that > Marx's thinking changes after the Grundrisse with the discovery of > Quesnay's theory of re-production. Anyone's thoughts on this would > be appreciated. > Yours, Rakesh >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 31 2006 - 00:00:03 EDT