From: Nicola Taylor (nmtayl@YAHOO.COM.AU)
Date: Sun Nov 26 2006 - 01:05:30 EST
Jerry, I regularly read your posts which I continue to find informative and thoughtful, at times a welcome challenge to my own ideas. I guess it's a hazard of unmoderated lists that some members will not appreciate the expression of views that conflict with their own, but instead CONSISTENTLY use the list to distort the arguments of other members. Imho, one is not obliged to defend oneself against such nonsense. Further, in my experience, the best way to deal with unwanted correspondence and/or harassment is to mark a repeat offender's email address as "spam". My browser automatically deletes Rakesh's contributions before they enter my mailbox. In short, I uphold his right to express any opinion that he wishes to express; at the same time I exercise a choice neither to read nor talk to him. In solidarity Nicky --- ope-admin@RICARDO.ECN.WFU.EDU wrote: > > Well all this is so appropriate in the week that > Michael "Kramer" > > Richards outed himself. > > Folks: > > * Is there ANYONE on the list OTHER than Rakesh who > believes that the > above, and similar statements which were recently > expressed, are not > examples of personal abuse? > > * Is there ANYONE else on the list OTHER than Rakesh > who believes that > I have said _anything_ racist on this list? > > * Is there ANYONE on this list on this list OTHER > than Rakesh who > believes that I have in any way suggested _anything_ > which is sexist on > this list? > > * Is there ANYONE on the list who OTHER than Rakesh > who does not see > that his most recent posts are a form of harassment? > > * Is there ANYONE on the list OTHER than Rakesh who > does not agree > that harassment of a listmember is personally > abusive and hence a > flame? > > In solidarity, Jerry > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 30 2006 - 00:00:06 EST