Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?

From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Tue Mar 27 2007 - 17:46:32 EDT

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Custers militarism"
Previous message: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?"
In reply to: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Custers militarism"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Custers militarism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

[Diego wrote:]
> Now, you and Jerry can easily see why we should keep dealing with the TP.
> Because we need to find referees that don't hamper our work because they
don't
> understand what we are doing.
> Don't you think this is an important reason?

No.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Custers militarism"
Previous message: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?"
In reply to: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Custers militarism"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Custers militarism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 01:00:12 EDT