From: Alejandro Valle Baeza (valle@SERVIDOR.UNAM.MX)
Date: Mon Apr 09 2007 - 08:21:06 EDT
glevy@PRATT.EDU wrote: >>If I understand wikipedia correctly, should I choose, I could get into a >>fight over anything, TSSI in this case, by simply editing the existing >>entry and then another person could edit my editing, etc. and, like wow! >> Yet, no one would know WHO edited what. It's offensive, as far as I am >>concerned, if I understand things at wikipedia correctly (anyone: please >>correct me if I am wrong about its process). >> >> > > > >Hi Paul Z: > >If someone was really interested in the evolution of an entry, then >s/he could click on 'history' at the top of the page. Many controversial >entries also have content under 'discussion' and there can be a warning in >the page that what has been written has not been authenticated and is >controversial. The identity of authors can be cryptic, however, and it's >not always easy to identify who is the author of what. But, yes, if you >wanted to, you (or anyone else) who has an account with them can sign in >and edit the TSSI or other entries. > >In solidarity, Jerry > >PS to Jurriaan: did you notice the (4/6) comment by Kliman that he "added >material on what the TSSI is really about, corrected major >misstatements ...."? > > > > Metroeconomica 55:1 (2004) 96-114 THE TEMPORAL SINGLE-SYSTEM INTERPRETATION OF MARX'S ECONOMICS: A CRITICAL EVALUATION Roberto Veneziani* London School of Economics and Political Sciences and Università degli Studi di Siena (October 2002; revised November 2002) ABSTRACT The temporal single-system (TSS) quantitative approach to Marx's economics is analysed. It is shown that TSS models lack a clear equilibrium concept and a coherent (dis)equilibrium methodology, and that Marx's propositions on value and exploitation are tautologically obtained (i) by constructing a money costs theory of value, where by assumption values are equal to market prices, apart possibly from short-run deviations; and (ii) by arbitrarily assuming that the undefined monetary expression of labour time is positive. In general, the shortcomings of the analytical framework make TSS claims, including the proofs of the law of the tendential fall in the profit rate, unwarranted. Does any body know if there is a response of the TSS followers to this critic? By the way Steedman suport this critic to TSS. Cordialmente Alejandro Valle Baeza -- Posgrado Facultad de Economía Av. Universidad 3000 Circuito interior México 04510, DF México Tel. 55-56222148 fax 55-56222158 Página web: http://usuarios.lycos.es/vallebaeza
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 30 2007 - 00:00:16 EDT