From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Sat Aug 18 2007 - 16:10:49 EDT
The title "Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital'" makes me uncomfortable.
Is not the subtext for such a title itself a claim that the author knows
exactly what 'Capital' is about?
Are we so insecure in our understanding of 'Capital' as a work of living
scientific research?
Why not something more modest like "An Interpretation of Marx's 'Capital'"?
Paul Z.
************************************************************************
(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001 "a benchmark in 9/11 research"
(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA
Research in Political Economy, P.Zarembka,ed, Elsevier hardback
********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
--On Saturday, August 18, 2007 12:37 AM -0700 Ian Wright <wrighti@ACM.ORG>
wrote:
> I'm forwarding this from the HES list since I thought it may be of
> interest to OPE-L list-members, particularly the audio file links.
>
> ----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
> A book launch for Andrew Kliman's "Reclaiming Marx's
> 'Capital': A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency"
> (2007, Lexington Books, paperback and hardcover) took
> place on July 11, 2007 at the School of Oriental and
> African Studies (SOAS) in London.
>
> Speakers included:
>
> Michael Roberts, columnist at marxist.com
> Alan Freeman, co-editor, "Marx and Non-equilibrium
> Economics"
> Martin Graham, member, Economic Committee of the
> Communist Party of Britain
> Chris Harman, editor, "International Socialism"
> journal
> Andrew Kliman, author, "Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital'"
>
> Audio recordings of all of the talks, as well as
> comments and questions from the audience and speakers'
> responses, can be downloaded at
>
> http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=reclaiming%20Marx%27s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 31 2007 - 00:00:10 EDT