From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Sat Aug 18 2007 - 16:48:20 EDT
Hi Paul Z: > The title "Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital'" makes me uncomfortable. As well it should! > Is not the subtext for such a title itself a claim that the author knows > exactly what 'Capital' is about? Yes. > Are we so insecure in our understanding of 'Capital' as a work of living > scientific research? It depends on who you mean by "we". > Why not something more modest like "An Interpretation of > Marx's 'Capital'"? You have to consider the source. Modesty is not one of the virtues of the author or his theoretical tendency, IMHO. You do recall the discussion we had about allegedly "Copernican" advances in theory and "Marx's Marxism", don't you? Hark! Do you hear the sound of milions of proletarians on the march saying that "Marx was correct" - after all - about the "transformation problem"? The author - and Alan Freeman - have lost all perspective on the relative importance of their theoretical endeavors, imo. They are in serious need of a reality check. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 31 2007 - 00:00:10 EDT