Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination

From: Ian Wright (wrighti@ACM.ORG)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 11:44:55 EDT

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] The Last Letter of Kurt Richebacher"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Reply: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Paul

> Fred surely this is just an artefact of the fact that Sraffa uses
> difference equations rather than the full formalism of differential
> calculus.

Sraffa doesn't use difference equations in PCMC. Perhaps you meant
something else?

Best,
-Ian.

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] The Last Letter of Kurt Richebacher"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Reply: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 00:00:05 EDT