[OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Fri Oct 19 2007 - 10:19:46 EDT

Next message: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] stocks versus bonds in the global market"
Next in thread: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI"
Reply: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI"
Reply: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI - consensus?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

A reply by Simon M and Roberto Veneziani to Kliman and Freeman,
published by _Capital & Class_ (Summer, 2007), is online:
<http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3780/is_200707/ai_n19433639>

Is there anyone (anywhere in the world) who has actually debated K & F
who would disagree with the following understated conclusion?

"In their use of logic, their reporting of the views of those with whom
they disagree, and in the elaboration of their own fundamental categories,
Kliman and Freeman leave something to be desired."

Is there - outside of the proponents of the TSSI - consensus or
near-consensus on that conclusion?

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] stocks versus bonds in the global market"
Next in thread: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI"
Reply: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI"
Reply: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI - consensus?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 31 2007 - 00:00:19 EDT