From: Philip Dunn (hyl0morph@YAHOO.CO.UK)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2007 - 16:50:12 EDT
It is a pity that several equations are missing from this online version. It is a very short paper and is also short on measured argument. Consensus? Not a chance. On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 10:19 -0400, glevy@PRATT.EDU wrote: > A reply by Simon M and Roberto Veneziani to Kliman and Freeman, > published by _Capital & Class_ (Summer, 2007), is online: > <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3780/is_200707/ai_n19433639> > > Is there anyone (anywhere in the world) who has actually debated K & F > who would disagree with the following understated conclusion? > > "In their use of logic, their reporting of the views of those with whom > they disagree, and in the elaboration of their own fundamental categories, > Kliman and Freeman leave something to be desired." > > Is there - outside of the proponents of the TSSI - consensus or > near-consensus on that conclusion? > > In solidarity, Jerry ___________________________________________________________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 31 2007 - 00:00:19 EDT