Re: [OPE-L] reply to Ian W

From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2007 - 14:20:52 EDT

Next message: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - do anyone think it is relevant?"
Previous message: GERALD LEVY: "[OPE-L] Historical Materialism 2007 Provisional Conference Timetable (revised)"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] reply to Ian W"
Next in thread: Dogan Goecmen: "Re: [OPE-L] class theory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>But I will freely discuss any issue
>regarding Marxism and Marxist economics on this list, with or without
>your permission or approval, including returning advice on what does,
>and what does not, constitute productive criticism of other
>perspectives.

Ian:

For the record,  I never suggested otherwise. Of course, you realize
that I reserve for myself the same rights that you have. Enough
said.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - do anyone think it is relevant?"
Previous message: GERALD LEVY: "[OPE-L] Historical Materialism 2007 Provisional Conference Timetable (revised)"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] reply to Ian W"
Next in thread: Dogan Goecmen: "Re: [OPE-L] class theory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 31 2007 - 00:00:20 EDT