From: Dogan Goecmen (dogangoecmen@AOL.COM)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2007 - 13:29:53 EST
Jerry, I do not want to trevel in the history of our list just now. With "this problem" I meant Ajit issue. You seem to try establish the case that Rakesh is a problem. I do not think so as I argued in my former posts. When M.L. left the list he said that there are other lists he wants to engage more. The issue is closed for me. I will not reply any e-mails in this matter anymore. Lets get back to real issues. There is my question: are there corne stones in the history of the reception of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, which must be taken in the account if I wanted to produce a paper on how Smith's work has been used and misused? In solidarity, Dogan -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: ope-admin@RICARDO.ECN.WFU.EDU An: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU Verschickt: Mi., 14. Nov. 2007, 18:44 Thema: Re: [OPE-L] Ajit Sinha's Letter of Resignation > Or do we have some equals and more equals on the list? ogan: Do you want me to review the circumstances (a long track ecord of infractions going back many years) which led to the reation of a special policy for Rakesh? Do I need to explain to you, for example, how serious it is to ublicly charge others with plagiarism? We should solve this problem fundamentally. agree. The most democratic way to resolve it would be for s to have a public discussion on the status of Rakesh ollowed by a vote. In solidarity, Jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail für alle. Klicken Sie auf AOL.de um heraus zu finden, was es sonst noch kostenlos bei AOL gibt.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 00:00:03 EST