Re: [OPE-L] Suspension

From: Dogan Goecmen (dogangoecmen@AOL.COM)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2007 - 09:14:28 EST


Jerry, did the AC come to the conclusion that there was break of this agreement or is that your individual decision?

Dogan


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- 
Von: ope-admin@RICARDO.ECN.WFU.EDU
An: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
Verschickt: Fr., 16. Nov. 2007, 14:35
Thema: Re: [OPE-L] Suspension



See the following.
In solidarity, Jerry



------------------------ Original Message ----------------------------
ubject: list policy
rom:    ope-admin@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
ate:    Sun, October 28, 2007 8:15 am
o:      ope-l@sus.csuchico.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All:
The Advisory Committee issued a statement on January 24, 2007 which stated
n no uncertain terms what our expectations are for Rakesh and what the
onsequences would be for violations. See below. We (the Advisory
ommittee and I) discussed that policy again recently and informed Rakesh
once again) that he will be expected to ahere *to the letter* of the
anuary 24 AC Statement.
We will inform you of further decisions on this matter.
In solidarity, Jerry


--------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
ubject: Advisory Committee Statement
rom:    ope-admin@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
ate:    Wed, January 24, 2007 11:05 am
o:      ope-l@sus.csuchico.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
AC STATEMENT
After much discussion and deliberation, the AC recommends unanimously
hat Rakesh be resubscribed to the list, subject to the terms and
onditions listed below, and Jerry agrees with this decision:
1.  Clear acceptance by Rakesh of Jerry as the list moderator, no
enigration of his performance, and no more calls for his resignation.
2.  No comments by Rakesh about Jerry or Ajit, either explicitly or by
nnuendo, or about any of their comments.  The general point here is that
ach listmember has the right to request, if needs be, that he or she not
e engaged in debate by specified other listmembers.  When such a request
s made, in a clear and definite manner, it must be honored.
aturally, we hope and expect that this privilege will rarely be invoked.
3.  Any public accusation of plagiarism on the list, directed at a
ellow listmember, is simply unacceptable and will result in immediate
nd permanent unsubbing.  In the very unlikely event that one
istmember has a complaint of plagiarism against another listmember,
his matter should be pursued off-list with the AC.
4.  Now that the AC has a clearer idea of what we mean by "flames"
"deliberately hostile and insulting"; "not intended to advance the
iscussion, but to insult other listmembers"), we intend to act much
ore quickly and forcefully in the event of future flames.
5.  There will be NO EXCEPTIONS to these rules.  Violation of any of
hese rules will lead to unsubbing for a substantial period of time, to
e determined by the AC and Jerry.
All in all, we believe that given Rakesh's agreement with the above
compromise", we can move on and have productive discussions.  As John
olloway said, the right is beating up on us bad enough; we shouldn't
e fighting each other.

he Advisory Committee
  Allin Cottrell
  Fred Moseley
  Alejandro Valle Baeza


________________________________________________________________________
Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail für alle.  Klicken Sie auf AOL.de um heraus zu finden, was es sonst noch kostenlos bei AOL gibt.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 00:00:03 EST