Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital

From: Jerry Levy (jerry_levy@VERIZON.NET)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2008 - 15:59:30 EST

• Next message: Simon Mohun: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
• Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
• Maybe in reply to: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jerry, do you think there is any advantage to measure profitability as s/(c+v) over s/K? The latter tells us the maximum growth of the stock of real capital.

Hi Dave:

Yes.  The class relations specific to capitalism are embedded
in the 1st formula and obscured in the 2nd one.

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: Simon Mohun: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
• Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
• Maybe in reply to: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST