Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital

From: Jerry Levy (jerry_levy@VERIZON.NET)
Date: Sun Jan 13 2008 - 09:05:42 EST

• Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] The Moseley paradox and stock/flow definitions"
• Previous message: Alfredo Saad Filho: "[OPE-L] Lectureship in development studies (SOAS)"
• Maybe in reply to: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Next in thread: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Reply: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Let s = 10, s = v = 80, and u = 2. Then s-u/(c+v) =10%,
> s-u/(s+v+u) = 9.75% , while s/(c+v+u) = 12.2%.

Hi Ian

You're right - I plugged in different numbers (and a positive
# for c) and there are different results using the different formulas.  Thanks.  But, it doesn't in any way resolve the issue the issue of which is the desired formula - as you recognize.

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] The Moseley paradox and stock/flow definitions"
• Previous message: Alfredo Saad Filho: "[OPE-L] Lectureship in development studies (SOAS)"
• Maybe in reply to: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Next in thread: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Reply: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST