[OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?

From: Jerry Levy (jerry_levy@VERIZON.NET)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2008 - 06:21:41 EST

• Next message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Previous message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] productive and unproductive labour and forms of surplus value"
• Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Maybe reply: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jerry, I think you need to put the argument in some formalism to make it transparent. Let's use the three department model with monetary variables.


Hi Dave Z:

I don't favor a three department model. If you look at the issue using a two department model - where what you and others call Department III is simply included in Department II - you will get different results.

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Previous message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] productive and unproductive labour and forms of surplus value"
• Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Maybe reply: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST