Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?

From: Jerry Levy (jerry_levy@VERIZON.NET)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2008 - 08:47:42 EST

• Next message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Previous message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Maybe in reply to: Jerry Levy: "[OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> the three department model is the smallest possible one which
> allows us to see how means of production, workers' and
> capitalists' consumption are produced.



No, Dave.  One can see how means of production and means of
consumption are (re)produced within a two department model.

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Previous message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Maybe in reply to: Jerry Levy: "[OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] 2,3, many departments? 100 blooming departments?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST