From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2008 - 08:33:34 EDT
> What is truly amazing is just how much you can predict, if you overcome > the obstacles of the type that I mentioned, i.e. if you remove the source of > unpredictability. Hi Jurriaan: You've made similar statements before but I honestly can think of no concrete examples of "truly amazing" macro- or microeconomic forecasts for or within capitalist social formations. What specific examples are you thinking of? Rather than being amazing, most economic forecasts *when they are right* are generally no-bainers. It often is simply a matter of assuming that the rate of change of major variables continues in the same direction as has occurred in the recent past. This is often all well and good if you are making a projection for a period which is characterized by relative economic stability, e.g. a short-term forecast during one period of capitalist expansion for another moment i n time of that same expansion. But, such forecasting models are not generally very good at predicting major changes in market activity. If you think that capitalist economies are characterized by a chaotic dynamic process then they limits the effectiveness of the forecasting models. Minsky- type models aren't exactly forecasting models, are they? In solidarity, Jerry _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2008 - 00:00:15 EDT