Re: [OPE] Dialectics for the New Century

Next message: dogangoecmen@aol.com: "Re: [OPE] How to read Capital"
Previous message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE] How to read Capital"
In reply to: GERALD LEVY: "RE: [OPE] Dialectics for the New Century"
Next in thread: dogangoecmen@aol.com: "Re: [OPE] Dialectics for the New Century"
Reply: dogangoecmen@aol.com: "Re: [OPE] Dialectics for the New Century"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

davez@kth.se

on 2008-04-03 15:12 GERALD LEVY wrote:
>
>     I would put it somewhat differently: formal logic is a sub-set (or
>     'special case')  of dialectical logic.  I agree that dialectical logic
>     does not _negate_ formal logic. Neither, though, can dialectical
>     logic be _reduced_ merely to formal logic.
>

I have a question for Jerry or anyone else. Is there any logical system 
that cannot be formalized? If so, how does one express such a logic?

//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope