From: dogangoecmen@aol.com
Date: Thu Apr 03 2008 - 13:24:49 EDT
All logical systems must be able to be formalised. Otherwise they are not complete. The question is not whether a logical system is able or cannot to be formalised. But how the formalised form of logic relates to reality to natural, social and , if you like, epistemological relations. Husserl gives a very good explanation of this in his "Crises of European Sciences". He explains that formalisation itself is an outcome of historical social developments. Dogan -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Dave Zachariah <davez@kth.se> An: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu> Verschickt: Do., 3. Apr. 2008, 19:07 Thema: Re: [OPE] Dialectics for the New Century on 2008-04-03 15:12 GERALD LEVY wrote: > > I would put it somewhat differently: formal logic is a sub-set (or > 'special case') of dialectical logic. I agree that dialectical logic > does not _negate_ formal logic. Neither, though, can dialectical > logic be _reduced_ merely to formal logic. > I have a question for Jerry or anyone else. Is there any logical system that cannot be formalized? If so, how does one express such a logic? //Dave Z _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope ________________________________________________________________________ Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail für alle. Klicken Sie auf AOL.de um heraus zu finden, was es sonst noch kostenlos bei AOL gibt. _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT