From: Paul Cockshott (wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2008 - 07:17:38 EDT
Paul "My view is that the social division of labour involves a situation where different people work for substantial periods on different tasks and become skilled in these: weavers, potters, carpenters etc as such it predates the separation of labour from the means of production." Dogan This is usually described as technical division of labour rather than social division labour. Paul in reply In that case what is your social division of labour? The separation of the producers from the means of production is not a division of labour. The division of society into wage labourers and capitalists is not a social division of labour, since the point being a capitalist is not to labour yourself but get others to do it for you. Paul "A social division of labour can exist under multiple different relations of prodution, some of which are commodity producing ones and some not." Dogan Fine, but we are talking about modern form of social division of labour. Paul in reply Since when? We were originally talking about your dialectical derivation of capitalist social relations from the usevalue exchange value distinction. You went from that to say that commodity production implied the social division of labour and thus the separation of the producers from the means of production. When I say that this was not necessarily the case historically, you then say that you are talking about modern capitalist social division of labour. But this modern capitalist social division of labour was what you were initially trying to infer from the commodity. This is what I mean by sleight of hand in dialectical argument, a conclusion is drawn that is not supported by the stated premises, but can only be supported by unstated premises. _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT