From: Dave Zachariah (davez@kth.se)
Date: Tue Apr 08 2008 - 12:50:34 EDT
on 2008-04-08 18:28 dogangoecmen@aol.com wrote: > Be honest and reply to my post if you want to. Do not ascribe to > people positions that are not theirs. Sorry Dogan, this was not the intention. What I was reacting to was your statement: > I rather think with Hegel that any approach > > that does not see unity in diversity tends to be dogmatic. Being non-dogmatic is being prepared to abandon ones ideas in the face of new evidence. But what I'd like to know is what science explicitly mentions the concept "unity in diversity"? And which do not? Is it necessary for successful sciences? Also I'd like to know, is it conceivable that Marx was wrong about certain theories? And how would you go about to test it? //Dave Z _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT