From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 2008 - 11:05:31 EDT
> It is not the assumption that gold is money that I am questioning here> but his understanding of how the gold standard worked. What I am saying> is that Ricardos account of it is more plausible than Marx's. Hi Paul C: Besides the economic historical question, do you see anything else at stake in this question? If so, what? In solidarity, Jerry _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT