From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2008 - 09:31:47 EDT
> Yes, in that exchange I realized that you are using VLP as in the sense > of (b), but you are leaving out domestic labour resulting in a weak > theory from a historical perspective. Hi Dave: No, I was _not_ using VLP in the sense of (b). You wrote previously of (b) that it is a "more general and historically invariant concept". I do not conceive of the VLP (or value, SNLT, and labour power as a commodity) as a trans-historical concept and this constitutes one of the major theoretical disagreements that I have with you (and Paul C and Allin and ....). What is crucial from my perspective is that these concepts are specific to the CMP and a particular form of labor. In solidarity, Jerry _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 31 2008 - 00:00:10 EDT