From: Philip Dunn (hyl0morph@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Mon Aug 11 2008 - 03:29:08 EDT
Hi Jerry, I did choose the word truthiness deliberately. The trouble is no-one is ever in such an Olympian position. In science both those in favour of a paradigm change and those holding on to an old paradigm are being perfectly scientific. Details and evidence are not theory free. Anyway, enough of Philosphy of Science 101. "September Clues" is a very detailed examination of the TV evidence, containing shots of the "second hit" where no Boeing can be seen and much more. It has been challenged, for example, over the famous nose out shot. There is a wonderful clip where some-one, not Cheney, says a missile hit the Pentagon and has to hastily correct himself. On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 05:03 +0100, GERALD LEVY wrote: > > I must admit it has truthiness for me but I would be interested in > > contrary views. > > > Hi Phil: > > Truthiness, though, is a rather poor standard to base one's > perspective on. As in all such events, the details must be > looked at scientifically, dispassionately, and without > prejudice or pre-determination if one wishes to uncover truth, > rather than truthiness. > > In solidarity, Jerry > _______________________________________________ > ope mailing list > ope@lists.csuchico.edu > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 00:00:07 EDT