From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2008 - 08:39:35 EDT
Hi Dave: A point made by Paul Z in the video bears repeating: there WAS a conspiracy. That is not in doubt. There is an official US State Department version of what the conspiracy was and who was responsible and there are alternative theories which suggest other forms of conspiracy and present evidence in support of their hypotheses. The question concerns WHICH conspiracy theory holds up better against the criteria you identified. In my opinion, the "official" conspiracy theory has been scrutinized, shredded to bits, and has NO credibility. What then is "the truth"? I don't know - other than it's NOT what the state and the media have asserted. In solidarity, Jerry > The mass of evidence for extraordinary and implausible (by the standards > of Occam and his razor) claims have to significantly *outweigh and > contradict* the simpler and widely accepted general account. This is not > the case for the 911 conspiracy theories today. (The Griffin interview > being a perfect example.) _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 00:00:07 EDT