> From this follows that what existed in the Soviet Union was a distinct > mode of production.
Hi Dave:
No, that doesn't necessarily follow: one could, for example, conceive
of the USSR as a "transitional" economy where elements of different
modes of production were in contention. It was certainly a distinct
social formation, but that doesn't mean that it represented a new
(or old) mode of production. But, I guess that gets us into the
distinction between mode of production and social formation.
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Mon Sep 1 16:33:10 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:12:31 EST