(I am not sure that his proposal would end gambling in debt obligations, but thought it interesting enough to post it - JB).
Ending Casino Capitalism
by ROBERT POLLIN
Wall Street is begging for government life support. Unfortunately,
we need to acquiesce to avoid another 1930s-style
Depression. But Wall Street has to accept in return a revived
regulatory system that would promote financial stability and
the well-being of the majority. Here are four observations
and proposals, intended to apply to all US financial markets
and institutions, whether banks, holding companies, hedge
funds or variations thereof:
1. The bailout doesn't have to cost taxpayers $700 billion.
The most cost-effective way to finance the bailout is for the
Federal Reserve, not the Treasury, to buy the bad debt from
distressed financial institutions. If the Fed, as opposed to the
Treasury, buys the bad debt, the funds don't come out of taxpayers'
pockets but from the Fed's power to create money.
This may seem like alchemy. But in fact it is simply a variation
on what the Fed does normally-in conducting day-to-day
monetary policy and in managing financial crises. Last year the
Fed bought $840 billion in government bonds outright from
US banks. As recently as September 19, the Fed announced
plans to purchase short-term debt obligations issued by Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac and the federal home loan banks as a way
to "further support market functioning." The Fed can later
re sell the bad debt to private dealers, albeit at distress-level,
cut-rate prices. In any case, the funds to transact these operations
will not have to come from taxpayers.
2. Tax speculators. A small sales tax on all securities transactions-
stocks, bonds, derivatives, mortgage-backed securities,
short sales and all new schemes-would raise the costs of
speculative trading and therefore discourage casino capitalism.
At the same time, the tax will not discourage investors
who intend to hold securities for a longer period since unlike
the speculators they will be trading infrequently. This tax
could generate, conservatively, $100 billion per year in government
revenue-enough to cover, for example, a green investment
program that could create 2 million new jobs.
3. Impose asset-based reserve requirements. These force financial
institutions to maintain cash reserve funds in proportion
to the riskier assets in their portfolios. They can discourage firms
from holding excessive amounts of risky assets and serve as a cash
cushion to draw on when market downturns occur. The same
principle guides the margin requirements that apply to stocks
purchased with borrowed funds. During the late 1990s, Federal
Reserve chair Alan Greenspan acknowledged that he could have
dampened the stock market bubble by raising margin requirements,
but he refused to take action. Measures like these can also
push financial institutions to channel credit to projects that advance
social welfare. Policy- makers could stipulate that, say, at
least 5 percent of banks' loan portfolios be channeled to low-cost
housing and 5 percent to green investments. If the banks fail to
reach these quotas, they would then be required to hold this
same amount of their total assets in cash.
4. Loan guarantees for priority productive investments.
Financial bailouts are a form of credit risk insurance for reckless
speculators. Instead we need to provide credit risk insurance-
i.e., loan guarantees-to promote social priorities like
affordable housing and green investments. Investments in these
areas will expand. The securities sales tax and asset reserve
requirements should prevent speculators from converting such
initiatives into new casino opportunities. As such, the overall
costs to taxpayers would be small.
http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/other_publication_types/Nation_oct08_Pollin.pdf
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sat Oct 18 18:21:04 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:12:03 EST