Paul C.: "It also seems invidious to single out some employees as 'entrepreneurs'."
We can’t escape a social division of labour. We are not yet in the position of synthesize goods at zero labour costs.
The key rests in the access to the profession of managers under socialism. We can devise more transparent and less elitist paths.
Regards,A. Agafonow
________________________________
De: Paul Cockshott <wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
Para: wrighti@acm.org; Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Enviado: martes, 4 de noviembre, 2008 10:21:52
Asunto: Re: [OPE] Invention, Inventors, and the Productivity of Labor
Ian Wright wrote:
>
> If so, I worry about the social and political implications of this
> difference. I also think having two kinds of income is potentially
> redundant. Why not allow all workers in the firm decide, in a democratic
> manner, how the profit is distributed? Especially as the entrepreneurs
> are supplying labour, like everyone else.
>
It also seems invidious to single out some employees as 'entrepreneurs'. It may be appropriate
to recognise that a particular invention was made a particular team of people and pay them a one off
a bonus from the overall reduction in costs that the invention made possible, but that could be
any team of workers, not just a group of managers.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Nov 4 04:48:57 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:07:39 EST