Michael W., I don’t attribute a negative meaning to the label: ‘Pigouvian’. Just the opposite.
Despite our differences concerning the role of marginal prices in a market economy (socialist or capitalist), I sympathize with Pigouvians, particularly with their understanding of the decreasing utility of income.
One market socialist, Abba Lerner, used it to build a powerful argument in favour an equalitarian distribution of income.
Regards,A. Agafonow
________________________________
De: Michael Williams <michael.williams.j@googlemail.com>
Para: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Enviado: viernes, 5 de diciembre, 2008 12:03:13
Asunto: Re: [OPE] the composition and definition of the list
People can label my work whatever they think fit, but first they would need to become familiar with it ... .
'Pigouvian', though, would characterise at most only a couple of recent exchanges on this list that are informed by my understanding of orthodox public sector economics that I have, from time to time, taught at graduate level.
comradely greetings
michael W
2008/12/5 Alejandro Agafonow <alejandro_agafonow@yahoo.es>
When I refer to my membership in OPE-L I use to say that it '[…] is a small, closed list of
scholars who have been discussing controversial issues on political economy since September, 1995.'
I prefer not to be pigeonholed as Marxist, but as a 'progressive' in general.
I would also consider Michael Wiliams as a non-Marxist. I don't know what does he think, but from our recent discussion I would consider him a sort of Pigouvian economist, with whom I share some views.
Regards,A. Agafonow
________________________________
De: GERALD LEVY <gerald_a_levy@msn.com>
Para: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Enviado: viernes, 5 de diciembre, 2008 10:55:34
Asunto: [OPE] the composition and definition of the list
> Ja! Ja! Ja! No, not insulted. But it's true. I'm not a Marxist. I think that I'm not
> the only one in this list that is not a Marxist.
Hi Alejandro:
It's true - you're not the only one.
You should talk to Michael Eldred.
Also - as he likes to frequently remind us - Jurriaan does not consider himself to
be a Marxist.
There's also Steve Keen (who isn't receiving postings at this time): he wouldn't
consider himself to be a Marxist (he's a heterodox - Post-Keynesian - economist).
Then, there are members like:
- Gil Skillman (who, also, isn't receiving postings now) who _does_ consider
himself to be a Marxist, but - like yourself - is a market socialist.
- Gary Mongiovi who _might_ consider himself a Marxian (like Sraffa did) - he is a
surplus approach economist.
> By the way, since the main criterion that keeps us together here is Socialism or Post-capitalism,
> why this list is defined as Marxist?
Actually, that's _not_ the "main criterion that keeps us together."
The most succinct statement of who we are is given in the archives:
http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive:
"OPE-L (Outline on Political Economy list) is a small, closed list of
Marxists who have been discussing controversial issues on political
economy since September, 1995".
So - although we frequently discuss both Marx and socialism - the
list is not *defined* by that: what "keeps us together" is a commitment
to discuss - as comrades in a collaborative group - *controversial
issues in political economy*.
As for there being a few members who aren't Marxist, I don't think
that hurts us. Rather, that friction can help to stimulate further
discussion. Nevertheless, I don't think that there would be support
on the list at this time for opening the doors to many other non-Marxists.
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
--
michael
_________________________________________
Dr Michael Williams, PhD, MSc, BA
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Dec 5 07:07:42 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2008 - 00:00:05 EST