Re: AW: [OPE] Services (->Paula)

From: Dave Zachariah <davez@kth.se>
Date: Sat Jan 03 2009 - 11:02:20 EST

Peter Fleissner wrote:
>
> The criterion I used is the ability of a branch of production to
> contribute to the surplus product. Services cannot directly contribute
> to it, and therefore they cannot contribute to surplus value nor to
> profits on the capitalist surface.
>

I really think this is a theoretical mistake that can lead to even
greater practical policy mistakes. For instance, transportation is
technically necessary for a wide range of activities. It is a basic
sector in the Sraffian sense.

I would recommend that you have a look at the attached working paper on
Adam Smith's concept of productive labour (which you are echoing) by Roy
Grieve at the University of Strathclyde. Also, there is a nice numerical
example in the Appendix.

//Dave Z

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

Received on Sun Jan 4 00:24:59 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 31 2009 - 00:00:03 EST