RE: AW: [OPE] Services (->Paula)

I have been reading that paper by Grieve, it is first rate, I must look him up since he is obviously a neighbour!
How did you get to hear of him?
 
Paul Cockshott
Dept of Computing Science
University of Glasgow
+44 141 330 1629
www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/

________________________________

From: ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu on behalf of Dave Zachariah
Sent: Sat 1/3/2009 4:02 PM
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
Subject: Re: AW: [OPE] Services (->Paula)

Peter Fleissner wrote:
>
> The criterion I used is the ability of a branch of production to
> contribute to the surplus product. Services cannot directly contribute
> to it, and therefore they cannot contribute to surplus value nor to
> profits on the capitalist surface.
>

I really think this is a theoretical mistake that can lead to even
greater practical policy mistakes. For instance, transportation is
technically necessary for a wide range of activities. It is a basic
sector in the Sraffian sense.

I would recommend that you have a look at the attached working paper on
Adam Smith's concept of productive labour (which you are echoing) by Roy
Grieve at the University of Strathclyde. Also, there is a nice numerical
example in the Appendix.

//Dave Z

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sun Jan 4 18:30:19 2009