> In effect the VFT argument ultimately seems to disolve this
> distinction between labour-content and price.
The _distinction_ is not dissolved by the non-deviation of prices from
values. A price is a sum of money. The intrinsic value of that sum of
money can equal the intrinsic value of the commodity it buys while the
distinction stands.
 ----------------------------------
What is the intrinsic value of an account standing at $100 with a solvent US bank?
It is a magnetic record on the database of the bank, using up to date costings for
storage media obtained from current adverts
cost per terabyte		         $150 
cost per byte		                $0.00000000015 
bytes per record		80
cost per record		                 $0.000000012 
storage management		$0.000000036 
total		                               $0.000000048 
we could presumably use the MELT to back estimate the number of seconds in this
we assume a MELT of about $20 an hour which will be correct to a factor of about 2
Melt	per hour	$20 
                
Hour per record		0.0000000024
Seconds		0.00000864
nanoseconds		8640
So we obtain a result that the intrinsic value of our $100  dollar account is a few microseconds 
of labour. Of course, the labour commanded by that account is about 5 hours of labour, so
it seems unlikely that the intrinsic value of money has anything to do with what it will buy.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Mar 20 05:48:45 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 31 2009 - 00:00:03 EDT