> I will stick to the critique of use value thinking, for the moment.
> A capitalist buys a machine, uses it for several years, the scraps it.
> How to theorise this?
> The use-value, the machine is unchanged for those years.
Hi Phil:
Does it? Well, I guess it can as a simplifying assumption. Is that
what you meant?
> Therefore value per unit of use-value is a variable quantity.
Actually, I think it's more likely that the "value per unit of use-
value" of "George" depreciates at a variable *rate*.
In any event, what is a "unit of use-value". You're not assuming
"utils" are you?
In solidarity, Jerry
> Simple stuff.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Apr 24 21:51:33 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 12 2009 - 15:26:04 EDT