Re: [OPE] labor-value and gravity

These people takes their classes where they perhaps can play games with wider society.

 This should have been: "These people takes their classes where they perhaps can play games for wider society."
Sorry for that.

D.Göçmen
http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: DGöçmen <dogangoecmen@aol.com>
To: ope@lists.csuchico.edu
Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2009 10:56 pm
Subject: Re: [OPE] labor-value and gravity

 Ian,

I am not ond of subjectivists theories of society, least of all game theories.

These people takes their classes where they perhaps can play games with wider society.

It is another example of the poverty of mainstream academic economics - it is not political economy.

D.Göçmen

http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/

-----Original Message-----

From: Ian Wright <wrighti@acm.org>

To: DGöçmen <dogangoecmen@aol.com>

Cc: ope@lists.csuchico.edu

Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2009 10:27 pm

Subject: Re: [OPE] labor-value and gravity

> It says: "One can hardly imagine a theory of mechanics without lever law,

> astronomy without the theory of gravitation, biology without the cognition

> of the process of cell multiplication. In economy however there expands a

> theory of production without the concept of the process of value creation,

> and it fells well in that."

This quote is a nice counterpoint to the Rushkoff quote that Paula=0
A
just forwarded.

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Sep 4 16:05:11 2009