I think we are still in the early stages of the valuation of knowledge as a 
commodity. It is not yet certain for many kinds of knowledge what its market 
value is, and for some kinds of knowledge it may never be quite certain. As 
I pointed out, there are different possibilities for valuation, similar to 
fixed capital: acquisition cost, sale value, replacement value, 
income-earning potential, labour content. Moreover knowledges may be 
revalued or devalued by other knowledges.
As I noted in wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_(Marxism) the 
transformation of a labor-product into a commodity (its "marketing") is in 
reality not a simple process, but has many technical and social 
preconditions. These often include:
*the existence of a reliable ''supply'' of a product, or at least a surplus 
or surplus product
*the existence of a social need for it (a market demand) that must be met 
through trade, or at any event cannot be met otherwise.
*the legally sanctioned assertion of private ownership rights to the 
commodity.
*the enforcement of these rights, so that ownership is secure.
*the transferability of these private rights from one owner to another.
*the right to buy and sell the commodity, and/or obtain it (privately) and 
keep income from such trade
*the (physical) transferability of the commodity itself, i.e. the ability to 
store, package, preserve and transport it from one owner to another.
*the imposition of exclusivity of access to the commodity.
*the possibility of the owner to use or consume the commodity privately.
*guarantees about the quality and safety of the commodity, and possibly a 
guarantee of replacement or service, should it fail to function as intended.
For many kinds of knowledge these kinds of criteria cannot, or cannot fully 
be met - they assume ownership or access barriers which do not exist yet.
To understand the cost structure of products, Marxist theoretical dogma will 
not do. We have to look at the data. For example, in December 2008, Kline 
revealed that the top marketers in the personal care industry collectively 
spend about 29% of sales on cost of goods, 53% on marketing, and 7% on other 
expenses including R&D and administration, leaving an operating margin of 
about 11%. 
http://blogs.klinegroup.com/2009/07/01/how-profitable-are-personal-care-products-personal-care-u-s-competitor-cost-structures-2009/
In reality the commodification of knowledge weakens capitalism, since the 
ability to produce, and produce at a competitive cost, has to scale the 
additional hurdle of the economic rents extracted from the monopolisation of 
knowledge by individuals and organisations.
Jurriaan
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Nov  5 02:24:10 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EST