Hi Dogan,
The distinction between knowledge and information is exceptionally important 
for the transformation of intellectual property into a tradeable commodity.
Namely, knowledge can exist only within human bodies, and requires conscious 
awareness, i.e. a knower.
Information is something that can be lodged in some kind of recording 
device, in a social relation, or in the human body.
By the time that we confuse knowledge with information, however, we have 
reified knowledge by substituting an object for the knowing subject.
But not only that, we cannot understand on this basis the forms in which 
intellectual property is turned into a commodity, or the politics of 
knowledge - because we have confused object and subject.
There is nowadays a large literature on the "knowledge economy" but most of 
it is rubbish, because it is written by academics who have never been 
outside a stuffy lecture hall.
You begin to understand about knowledge and information only when you have a 
lot of experience of how knowledge and information is actually used in the 
workforce. Personally, I have worked not only as teacher, but as translator, 
statistician, library officer and archivist/documentalist and I can say that 
experience has changed my whole idea about the topic.
Philosophers invent conceptual distinctions as quickly as I cut a slice of 
bread, with no real consequence.
But you begin to learn about conceptual distinctions only when those 
distinctions practically matter and have real effects on people. In that 
case, "how you cut your slice of bread" really does matter, and it can make 
the difference between eating and not eating.
Jurriaan
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Nov 19 03:33:35 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EST