Re: [OPE] Britain--parasitic and decaying capitalism: A comment

 I will check that out. But I remember to have read something like that before (perhaps the same article) and think that to say that labour aristocracy is a myth is in fact itself a myth and mystifies politics und justifies reformism. But about this later. Thank you for pointing that to me.

D.Göçmen
http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/
http://www.dogangocmen.blogspot.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Zachariah <davez@kth.se>
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Sent: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:09
Subject: Re: [OPE] Britain--parasitic and decaying capitalism: A comment

  On 2009-12-29 03:05, D. Göçmen wrote:
  
 labouraristoctratism functions almost everywhere almost in the same way. Thelogic is the same.
  
  

In addition to the serious deficiencies of this theory of 'bribery'that I pointed to, you may also want to read:

The Labor Aristocracy Myth
Charlie Post
  
"Despite its intellectual pedigree and longevity, the labor aristocracythesis is not a theoretically rigorous or factually realisticexplanation of working-class reformism or conservatism. This essayundertakes an examination of the theoretical and empirical economicclaims of the labor aristocracy thesis."
  
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1110>

//Dave Z

 
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Dec 29 08:28:37 2009